Anylogic gazprom
The research highlights the importance of multifunctional tools for developing experiences and sharing methodological experiences across countries.
The primary study objective is to determine whether the Interfax-ERA rating methodology and considered criteria could be applied in China to assess the provinces’ environmental, technological, and energy efficiency. The theoretical base, quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the energy-resource efficiency (ERE) rating, technological efficiency (TE), and ecosystem impact (EI) ratings are proposed based on the system methodology, developed within the framework of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The article analyzes the experience of the non-commercial Environmental and Energy Rating Agency (Interfax-ERA) ratings concerning the environmental assessment of Russian regions and the transfer of successful knowledge for evaluating 31 Chinese provinces. This paper concerns the necessity of ecosystem protection and energy efficiency rating development. In another case, if China's gas companies choose the way to focus on energy efficiency, energy savings and environmental protection, the high level of the sustainable growth rate growth until 2030 would be observed as predicted by research calculations. There is a risk of descent in the level of the Chinese gas companies' sustainable rate if they would concern only financial questions. All three suggested scenarios for the Russian gas industry are quite positive with the most probable scenario having a 5–10% sustainable growth rate growth until 2030. The situation is not the same for Chinese gas companies where the most significant non-financial factors are energy savings, return on ecological protection expenses and financial are a cost of the company, net profit growth, current ratio and earnings before interests and taxis. Results indicate that the most influential nonfinancial factors for the Russian gas companies' sustainable growth rate are Energy Return on Investment and Return on Labor indicators while financial factors are the cost of the company, net working capital return on fixed assets, and debt-equity ratio. With the help of Lasso regression, linear regression and forecasting model, the authors define financial and non-financial indicators influence the Chinese and Russian gas companies' sustainable growth rate. In this research, the authors try to find solutions for Russian and Chinese gas companies' sustainable growth. Methodology, social-energy-environmental factors affecting on sustainable growth, Data Envelopment Analysis, Shannon’s entropy. Keywords: sustainable growth, Higgins sustainable growth rate, Sustainable Growth System Theįollowing factors influence the SGSI level: production, energy saving, environmental rating,Įnvironmental footprint, reduction of air pollutant emissions, reduction of wastewater discharges to surface water bodies, environmental expenditures, personnel costs, social expenses,įinancial leverage, self-financing ratio, and EBITDA. Transformation of the stability of the system, it is advisable to use the negentropy index. Values and degree of importance to obtain a common performance indicator (CRS), whichĬan significantly improve the discrimination of sustainable growth models.
DEA efficiency is first calculated for all possible subsets of variables and analyzed using Shannon’s entropy theory to calculate the degree of importance ofĮach subset in Gazprom’s sustainable growth system. Uses Shannon’s negentropy to improve discrimination of models of a sustainable data coverage analysis (DEA) system. Research shows that Gazprom’s sustainable growth system is stable, but to avoid destabilization, we propose ways to prevent theĭevelopment of barriers to their sustainable growth. Index (SGR) and the Sustainable Growth Index (SGSI). WeĪnalyze the relationship between subsystem indicators using the Higgins Sustainable Growth Unlike traditional interpretations, we consider company sustainability to result from the interaction and interconnection between the financial, energy, environmental, and social subsystems (F-E-Env-S). In thisĪrticle we analyze possibilities for overcoming this problem by investigating sustainability ofįinancial growth of the largest Russian natural gas company, Gazprom. Bragina3,4įinancial and sustainable growth policies of companies often contradict each other. Company sustainable growth as the result of interactionīetween finance, energy, environmental and social factorsĪ.